Benchmark test gpu gtx 970 vs gtx 750 full#
Benchmark test gpu gtx 970 vs gtx 750 series#

Benchmark test gpu gtx 970 vs gtx 750 series#

To get prices for each card we visited and noted down the cheapest stock-speed card we could find, although we will be referring to the various overclocked and tweaked models available for each GPU, which will be more expensive, later on in the review.Tweet GeForce GTX 970 and 980 вЂ“ Oh hey look, it's Maxwell!ДЄh yes, welcome to a reference series product review that a lot of you fine ladies and gentlemen have been waiting on for a long time. Our test rig consists of an Asus X79-Deluxe motherboard, Intel Core i7-4960X processor, 16GB of RAM and a 1TB hard disk. WeвЂ™ve used 3D MarkвЂ™s Fire Strike test and four Unigine Heaven benchmarks to test theoretical performance, and weвЂ™ve taken idle and load temperatures and power requirements to see which card is the coolest and most frugal. WeвЂ™ve tested at 1,920 x 1,080, 2,560 x 1,440 and even 3,840 x 2,160 to see which card is best across single-screens вЂ“ and to check if any of them can handle 4K. Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and Crysis 3 all return from our previous reviews, and weвЂ™ve added Metro: Last Light and Batman: Arkham Origins to the mix. WeвЂ™ve locked and loaded five games for this GPU test. NvidiaвЂ™s card has a total memory bandwidth of 224GB/s, while AMDвЂ™s hardware ramps that up to 320MB/s. Partitioned memory or not, though, the GTX 970 canвЂ™t compete with the R9 290 here, either вЂ“ at least on paper.

ThatвЂ™s not the only issue вЂ“ NvidiaвЂ™s initial specification lists said that the GTX 970 had 64 ROPs and 2MB of cache, but itвЂ™s actually got 56 ROPs and 1.75MB of cache. There may be 4GB of GDDR5 soldered to the PCB, but thatвЂ™s not the whole story: half a gigabyte of that memory is partitioned into a slower section thatвЂ™s used for less demanding workloads, which means that only 3.5GB is available for high-end games. The GTX 970вЂ™s memory situation isnвЂ™t great, either. Its total throughput of 3.49 TFLOPS is impressive, but AMDвЂ™s Radeon R9 290 вЂ“ a card thatвЂ™s around ВЈ30 cheaper вЂ“ serves up 4.84 TFLOPS of power.

Benchmark test gpu gtx 970 vs gtx 750 full#

ItвЂ™s a move that means tasks can be delegated with more precision, which means that not all sections of the card need to always run at full pelt, so that power consumption and heat can both be reduced.Дespite the impressive specification and efficiency improvements, the GTX 970 is fighting an uphill battle. Nvidia has spent time reconfiguring the organisation of its stream processors in this card, so now theyвЂ™re arranged into smaller, more plentiful blocks. Maxwell isnвЂ™t just about pure power вЂ“ itвЂ™s about efficiency, too. ItвЂ™s the same GM204 core thatвЂ™s deployed inside the range-topping GTX 980, although that card has an even more impressive specification: 2,048 stream processors and a higher base clock of 1,126MHz. ItвЂ™s clocked to a potent 1,050MHz, and that figure can rise to a maximum boost speed of 1,250MHz. ItвЂ™s constructed using 1,664 stream processors вЂ“ the 750 Ti only had 640 вЂ“ and itвЂ™s paired with 4GB of GDDR5 memory. Here, though, itвЂ™s a far more formidable GPU. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 sits in the middle of NvidiaвЂ™s latest range, but itвЂ™s not got new hardware inside вЂ“ its Maxwell architecture first debuted in 2013вЂ™s mainstream GTX 750 Ti card.